Are you looking for ASUS 701SD/XP Eee PC drivers? Just view this page, you can through the table list download ASUS 701SD/XP Eee PC drivers for Windows 10, 8, 7, Vista and XP you want. Here you can update ASUS drivers and other drivers.

Is a professional Windows drivers download site, it supplies all devices for ASUS and other manufacturers. You can use two ways to download drivers and update drivers easily and quickly from here. Following is the list of drivers we provide.

Find great deals on eBay for asus eee drivers windows 7. Shop with confidence. ASUS Eee PC 701SD 7' Mini Computer Celeron M 353-Linux-512 - 8 GB SSD Series. Windows 7 on the EEE PC 701? – No, we are not kidding [Netbook] Raine over eeeuser has been to be install the Windows 7 onto the EEE. P and Windows 8.1 Drivers.

Or you can use to help you download and install your ASUS 701SD/XP Eee PC drivers automatically.

Here is a confession: I am getting pretty tired of netbooks running Windows XP. So when we got our Windows 7 Beta disc at PDC earlier this week, I couldn't wait to get it running on a netbook. This morning we loaded Windows 7 Ultimate (Pre-Beta) on an ASUS Eee PC 1000H. And: it works. The Eee PC running a 1.6 GHz Intel Atom processor and 1GB of RAM handles the new operating system pretty well, just as it ran Vista pretty well when on it a few months ago. We still had a problem getting a few of the Eee PC drivers to work with the system, but for the most part we were able to get all of the features to work using the XP drivers provided by ASUS.

Unsurprisingly, it takes 58 seconds for the system to boot the OS (see the video below). Of course, it has actually taken a minute for some systems to boot XP as well. However, the Eee PC 1000H boots in only 40 seconds with its default operating system. Once booted, it was pretty neat to see Windows 7 on the 10-inch screen.

As we mentioned in our, things pretty much look and feel like Windows Vista. But, one feature on Windows 7 might just be perfect for netbooks: the improved Network Manager. One thing I hate about Vista is having to connect to a wireless network. Things are easier in Windows 7. Selecting the network icon in the System Tray extends a jump list of available networks. Connecting to our home network was simple.

I just clicked the network name and entered the password. Beyond the wireless connection manager, things are pretty smooth in terms of performance. We will be running some benchmarks later, but in my use of the Eee PC 1000H for the entire evening I didn't have any hang ups while simultaneously chatting on Skype, writing this post in Wordpress, editing pictures in GIMP and uploading video files using Filezilla. As for graphics performance, video playback on Hulu.com was smooth. But a downloaded 720p high-definition video played back with a number of pauses. Additionally, when we attempted a video call over Skype we had a problem sending and receiving video at the same time. Doing one or the other was fine, but not both at the same time.

One of the chief complaints about Vista is that it's a 'heavy' operating system that eats up too many system resources. However, in his presentation at PDC, Windows and Windows Live SVP Steve Sinofsky said that WIndows 7 consumes less than half of his Lenovo S10 netbook's 1GB of RAM. It turns out he was right on the money as the performance monitor showed only 485MB of the RAM was in use with no applications -- except the standard Eee PC driver set -- were running. The Windows Experience Index score on the system was 2.3 (we got 2.7 on the system when it was running Vista). So how is Windows 7 on an Intel Atom netbook?

Two thumbs up for the new wireless manager and the new visual cues that are incorporated throughout the OS. We wouldn't give up Windows XP just yet considering the video playback, but the OS is still in beta and it is our hope that final version will be even better for Atom-based PCs. [flv:/flvs/EeePCWindows7Boot.flv 480 360].

Glasseffects Says: There's no comparison between Linux (any species) or Windows. Windows is simple since its a tool which does not require a manual to operate. Yes its sometimes pesky but which OS is 100% perfect without bugs and glitches? W7 is a great improvement upon its predecessors (including XP and Vista).

As far as the issue of hogging memory resources is concerned, there is much to gain by saving a few gigs on the hard drive. Besides memory really is cheap today. Evolution requires some input both from the manufacturer and from the user, one can even start an argument that 486 was so much cheap, one can easily surf net and view images with it, then why one needs a Pentium (or Atom)? There is no end to criticism if one's not willing to accept that growth is inevitable, be it market, hardware requirements or software development.

An operating system is no more a mere file manager, what adds to its appeal are the general aesthetic improvements that compliments to the pleasure of using it. Karthik Says: Running Win 7 on my old Lenova N100, i had win 2008 svr earlier.

Not bad at all. No issues with any drivers. It is able to automatically fetch any missing drivers from online search. Like those screen drag to left or right so you can compare two windows simultaneously.

Used a Dual core 1.66 Ghz pro with 2GB Ram, also tried using a 4GB USB stick as Dedcated Readyboost(Honestly no difference). Liked the Home Network Interface (Homegroup), and as usual microsoft does come up with changes to a few look and feel. One difference between Vista and win 7 is that it does not hang as much as Vista does.

Still my pick is for Win 2008 svr for laptop, i never shut down my laptop for over a year and zero crash. Planning to install Win 7 in my Acer Aspire D150 running Atom 1.66 (N280) ghz processor with 2GB Ram. Hope it works.

Advanced Kv Checker Jtag. Win XP is too old a OS to continue using. Vista was a failure no doubt but still a better interface. My installation comsumed around 7.8GB of disk space. SuiSam Says: Ok i have it installed. I must say.not bad at all.

I had one BSOD but probably because im using vista/xp drivers in 7. Other than that its running really well(remember it is a beta). As for those people that want to know how to install using a USB stick. Well u need to do a few things I will put the XP preparation of the USB stick here. The VISTA prep is widely documented. Check google for that.

1) look for the HP usb setup program to format it properly. (needs to be NTFS) 2) look for a guide to use MBRWIZ to make the partition active(a must) It does involve CMD line use.so if u dont know what im talkin about willis ask a friend who does. (this is for XP..a bugger it.found the website I good in depth guide.

Oh and Bootsect can be found in ur WINDOWS 7 cd in the BOOT directory. GOOD LUCK PEOPLES! SuiSam Says: I cant believe the whole OS wars are happening here. If u like linux that much.fair enough but keep in mind this is an article about Windows 7 not linux. Another thing.500mb of ram isnt much. Micro$haft has a lot more devices, security and added eye candy added to this than ur usual boring AMIGA STYLE WORKBENCH that I've seen running on most linux distributions. On the other hand.if boring interfaces are your thing.stick to linux.

I say its great that Micro$haft has finally got their shite together and actually thought about how to release Windows 7( i call it windows 7 of 9:D ) They could have done what they did with previous releases that were a steaming pile of crap until the first service pack was released. Good thinking! Now to those who will flame for my comments keep in mind. I have used numerous types of OS's that are out there.and for some reason. XP has been the one that i return to.purely because it works. I DONT nitpick over a tiny bit of ram loss(boo hoo to u go cry to ur mum after im finished with her) or whatever because it goes.its stable.and its common.

If linux or OSX one day reins supreme, then they must finally be doing something right. So now im going to start this voyage of installing windows 7 of 9. I hope it runs as well as you guys say it does. Mandy Says: As many have already said, reality is Windows is here to stay and too many people like it. Thing is, most people using Windows are not the kind to shout out loud how bad is the competition and how 'retarded' are it's users as opposed to many Linux users. That's the only explaination on why 99% of OS users preffer to enjoy their choice and keep away from brawling while the other 1% can only post comments on how Linux is so much better than Windows. Ok, everybody gets the idea, Linux is the best OS in the world, as you say, now please, take that and spare everybody of useless postings.

Keep to the subject at hand. Syed Shoaib Says: I dont know about many here, but on my Celeron 1.6 GHz, 2GB RAM, 40GB HDD system, i have run Windows XP (for 2 years), have run windows vista ultimate and now am running windows 7. I hesitated converting to vista, just because of many users comments on it.

But when i converted, i found vista experience much better. It was only booting which took long all else was speedy, same as in XP, but vista seemed to work much more smoothly than xp and now for almost 4 months i have been exptensively using windows 7. It works very fine as well. And I am having a celeron single core processor, i wonder why people having multi core processors are having trouble running vista or 7. However i am looking to sell this laptop of mine and buy an asus netbook, and i am confused as to install vista ultimate or 7 on it. For a good media centre experience in windows 7, one needs better processor.

But except the media centre problem and the thikker taskbar problem (for a small screen as on a netbook, it would be unnecessary consumption of space) i dont have any other reason why should i not choose 7 (seeing the useful library pattern in 7, a better taskbar.) Any tips, what to install on my new asus 1000 he? Lyareca Says: Microsoft does not copy crap from the Linux kernel. They bring the best of the KDE and GNOME environment over, just like Apple has done as well.

And, believe it or not, both KDE and GNOME have both brought over ideas from Windows. All three 'Take' what the users like and bring it over. Linux is nice for some people, but you can not compare Linux and windows. They have very customer bases, and operate differently. Anyways, I have an Eee 904HA. The Ethernet drivers for XP work with 7. The hybrid engine cannot find the proper video or audio drivers, so I get error messages.

Besides that, works well. And since there are linux lovers that look at this, has anyone tried the new beta for Ubuntu? Giuseppe Says: Pete.

Think about this; If Microsoft is such a great company and their OS RULEZ, why is Microsoft copying ideas from Linux? Ever Young Treadmill 86800f Owners Manual. I know that this is true because one of my friend works there and she told me that there is a team that is looking 24H at day into the Linux Kernel looking and copying from it ideas and features.

By the way, the last year the only OS that has lost market share was Windows. MAC is nearly 11% and Linux went from 1.5 to 3.2% in less than a year. Just look around you, and you will see more and more PC running Linux than you think; expecially now thanks to the bad economy.

Bye Pete and take care:) •. Pete Says: Don't people get tired of listening to this 'linux will rule the world' drivvel. Guseppe - you ned to learn the difference between what you'd LIKE and what is REAL. Too much time playing World of Warcraft I'm guessing. Linux doesn't even have 1% of the market - never has, never will. MACs do better but only just. The VAST, VAST majority of people are quite happy with Windows.

What on EARTH is the point of comparing Linux on the EEEs - for heavens' sake it can't even run SKYPE VIDEO never mind a decent game - and it can't run Outlook or any other half decent programs - GIVE UP! Giuseppe Says: How can you say that Windows seven booted fast? I took it more than 55 seconds!!!!! Before saying that Windows 7 is competitive to Linux, run Windows 7 on netbooks with ssd HD such the acer aspire one and trying to boot your SUPER Windows 7 in less that 35 seconds like I do (ssd hd). Windows is just one company that improves it, Linux the rest of the world. OpenSource and Mac are the Future. By the way, on my acer aspire one, my Linux box is using 128 MB of memory ram and not 500!!!!

Dptechno.com Says: re: sam bowne comment. Apparently the Eee has some problem finding the active partition after an installation onto an extended partition. It's not eee's fault. It's windows (i believe).

When installing, it deactivates other partitions from booting so that that partition is the only active one. A boot manager will fix these types of issues though.

Not really big problem if you had physical disks but since you're booting off different partitions it does make it abit more complicated. Sam Bowne Says: (Revised -- moderator, please post this one and disregard my earlier one).

I have two ASUS Eee PC 900HA machines, and I loaded Windows 7 Pre-Beta on both of them. The Eee has a 160 GB hard disk with three primary partitions on it, so I shrunk the Win XP Partition, and created an Extended Partition on it, as shown here: In both cases, it ran fine for the first 3 days, and then refused to boot up Windows 7.

Booting from my Win 7 install USB stick and running repair did not help. But my student Thanh Tran found the solution: 1. Boot from the Win 7 install device (CD or USB drive) 2. Select Repair, and open a Command Prompt.

At the Command Prompt, enter these commands: DISKPART LIST DISK 3. Find your hard disk on the list. I assume it is Disk 0. SELECT DISK 0 LIST PARTITION SELECT PARTITION 0 ACTIVE 4.

Reboot and it will work. Apparently the Eee has some problem finding the active partition after an installation onto an extended partition.